PhotoPost Photo Gallery Sales PhotoPost Sales Toll Free Phone Number
Mon-Fri 9am-4pm EST
  PhotoPost Photo Sharing Photo Gallery    Visualize community tm
| | | | | | | | |


 Home · Register · Search  

Home » Member Galleries » OuTpaTienT  · Slide Show · Next image »

Size reference wallpaper

Size reference wallpaper

I made this wallpaper for my 1600x1200 desktop and I find it's pretty handy to have the size reference right there all the time. Especially useful when designing web pages where you need to remember that even people at 640x480 resolution surf the web.


>>
OuTpaTienT



Registered User

Registered: October 2001
Location: Bay Area, CA USA
Posts: 3
Linked Thumbnail: 
Linked Medium: 
Medium Image: 
Direct link: 
IM/EMail: 
Date: Sat September 20, 2003
Views: 30,524
Keywords: size reference wallpaper

crouse
Registered User
I thought I had rated this once already ???

Anyway....... great idea! I like it.
The day Microsoft makes something that doesn't suck is probably the day they start making vacuum cleaners. --- Author Unknown.
#1 Sat September 20, 2003 6:16am
CubKid
Registered User
#2 Sat September 20, 2003 8:25am
warto
Registered User
#3 Sat September 20, 2003 12:20pm
JayMan
Registered User
nice idea...

But for anyone who wants to use this... make sure ya are running ya desktop @ 1600x1200 or bigger with it set as centred, NOT streched...

Kinda defeats the purpose as soon as any streching is on it!

Edit: Oh, for anyone wondering why i only gave it an 8... As mensioned above, needs to be used on 1600x1200 desktops, so people who can't run that high a res can't use it in its current form... Would be more universal if the different sizes were centred in the picture... That way if your running 1024x768, ya just set the wallpaper to centred (NOT stretched) and it'll work fine...

JayMan
#4 Sat September 20, 2003 4:02pm
OuTpaTienT
Registered User
Well, if anyone asked, I'd be happy to make versions for smaller desktops.

As far as stretching the wallpaper, that's pretty much connom knowledge isn't it? But yeah, you're right, other people not having common sense deserves to reflect poorly on my rating. Excuse me while I go change the rating I gave your car to a 1.
#5 Sat September 20, 2003 4:16pm
Detritus
Registered User
"Well, if anyone asked, I'd be happy to make versions for smaller desktops.


As far as stretching the wallpaper, that's pretty much connom knowledge isn't it? But yeah, you're right, other people not having common sense deserves to reflect poorly on my rating. Excuse me while I go change the rating I gave your car to a 1. "

LOL
#6 Sat September 20, 2003 5:40pm
shawshank62
Registered User
could you make one for 1024x768?
#7 Sat September 20, 2003 6:22pm
tony_j15
Contributing Editor
Thanks for puttin this up again OuT!
#8 Sat September 20, 2003 6:23pm
Siliconjunkie
Registered User
Quote:
But yeah, you're right, other people not having common sense deserves to reflect poorly on my rating.
Well I think his comment does directly reflect your work. It would be more useful if it wasn't tied to one resolution. So, whether you like it or not, at least he's honest.

And, how childish of you to run off and change your rating for him being honest.
#9 Sun September 21, 2003 2:36am
JayMan
Registered User
lol, all i was saying is if the resolutions had of been scaled down in the centre of the image instead of the corners, the image would have then been a universal image (up to 1600x1200 res obviously), hence anybody could have used this exact image without needing to make up a new image for each resolution.

lol ya can change ya rating of my car if ya want

JayMan
#10 Sun September 21, 2003 2:45am
OuTpaTienT
Registered User
You know I woundn't do that Jay.

And SJ, if that's your best jab, it's pretty pathetic.
#11 Sun September 21, 2003 2:59am
darrelld
Registered User
Where is 1152x864?
Will work for food!
#12 Sun September 21, 2003 5:11am
embj
Registered User
Same question darrelld asked. I run mine at that because my monitor doesn't support 1600x1200.
#13 Sun September 21, 2003 5:22am
joker_927
Registered User
i don't get it's usefullness.
Gateway Top-of-the-line PC = $2014
Home built top-of-the-line PC = $928
Exact clones...

Moral = Don't build your own PC, thus letting me save more money than you!
#14 Sun September 21, 2003 7:40am
FreakyOCR
Registered User
"And SJ, if that's your best jab, it's pretty pathetic."

There's out, always embroiled in controversy... (ducks)

lol

That's one reason I left Web Design. Too Many people running Netscape 3 and 640x480. Just when you get some code worked out you find it doesn't work in Netscape 3 and you have to re-write it to be more browser compatible. Argh.
- Freaky
#15 Sun September 21, 2003 8:48am
Page:  1 · 2

Photo Sharing Gallery by PhotoPost
Copyright © 2012 All Enthusiast, Inc.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:45 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.